State v. Jensen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Defendant, Leonard Edward Jensen, appeals from a judgment convicting him of burglary of a farm home near Albert Lea, Minnesota.
The evidence implicating defendant in the crime was the testimony of two witnesses, Marilyn Armell and Dale Olson. Their testimony, although otherwise uncorroborated, was clearly sufficient to sustain the conviction if, but only if, they were not themselves accomplices to the crime. Minn. St. 634.04 provides:
“A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless it is corroborated by such other evidence as tends to convict the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- State v. DurnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. MastrianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State v. TennysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- State v. MatousekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. HanleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. HouleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.