Legal Opinion

Rush v. Oursler

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 28, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThacher, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

An ordinary observer of the three plays here involved would undoubtedly form the impression that they were of the same type and had utilized the same material — that is, a shooting in a theater and the solution of the crime. But no impartial person would think that anything of importance in “The Spider” had been taken from either of the other two plays. The differences in the plays are more striking than their similarities, which relate only to the actual occurrence of the murder, and not to the solution of the mystery.

The inquiry always is: What, if…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dymow v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Fendler v. MoroscoNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  2. Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Greenbie v. NobleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. Lowenfels v. NathanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
  5. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. National Broadcasting Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API