Legal Opinion
Lowenfels v. Nathan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 28, 1932PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
The motion to dismiss the complaint is granted with eosts which will include an allowance for counsel fees to all the defendants, in whose behalf this motion is made, in the amounts hereinafter fixed and allocated respectively to each of them.
I. This is a suit by the author of what is described as.an operatic tragedy and is called “U. S. A. With Music” which he alleges was composed by him between 1924 and 1930, inclusive, published on or about January 13, 1931, and copyrighted on February 17, 1931, in the United States.
It is claimed that the defendants Kaufman,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Dymow v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Lewys v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Rush v. OurslerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
- Stevenson v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
3Cited by33 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Harold Lloyd Corporation v. WitwerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Alexander v. HaleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Greenbie v. NobleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.