State v. Clark
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McEVERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Joshua Clark appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of conspiracy to commit murder. Clark argues there was insufficient evidence to establish he conspired or agreed with another to commit murder. Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury verdict, we conclude there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and we affirm the judgment.
I
[¶2] Clark and Theo Crowe were acquaintances and co-workers at a construction business in Bismarck. On May 11, 2013, they were drinking together at Clark’s apartment in Bismarck. In an interview with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. NoorlunNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RambousekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. AddaiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. CainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SpillumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- LeRon Howard v. Colby BraunCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- State v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.