Legal Opinion
Pollard v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 25, 1986No. 85 C 0009PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
The Court’s last encounter with this lawsuit resulted in dismissal of Plaintiff’s, Henry Pollard (“POLLARD”), federal and pendent state claims. See Order, # 85 C 9 (August 7, 1985). Pollard has since filed an amended Complaint. The Defendants, City of Chicago (“CITY”), Lester Dickinson (“DICKINSON”), John D’Amico (“D’AMICO”) and Jerry Dalton (“DALTON”), filed a motion to dismiss the first amended Complaint. For the following reasons Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
The amended Complaint contains the following allegations: 1 Pollard began…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. PowellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Arrington v. DickersonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
- McCray v. City of DothanDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- Wilson v. University of VirginiaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1987
- Wallace v. City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.