Legal Opinion

State v. Scholl

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1988No. 87-481PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

Defendant has appealed from an order of the district court which denied his motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. In his motion he alleges that he “was denied his right to effective assistance of Counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution” in that his counsel informed him that he “was very likely to face on [sic] enhanced sentence by virtue of the Habitual Criminal Act”; that “he would have to plea bargen [sic] or the County Attorney would make it very hard on him”; and that “Defendant entered said plea after being informed by his…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. LeadinghorseNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. EllisNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. PierceNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. RiversNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. VanderpoolNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. ReddickNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. RehbeinNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. WakemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API