Legal Opinion

State v. Rivers

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1987No. 86-1080PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colwell, D.J., Retired.

This is a postconviction proceeding under Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3001 et seq. (Reissue 1985). Defendant, Robert Earl Rivers, appeals an order denying him an evidentiary hearing and postconviction relief, claiming an evidentiary hearing was required upon his motion that contained factual allegations which, if proved, constituted a violation or infringement of constitutional rights, and citing State v. Malek, 219 Neb. 680, 365 N.W.2d 475 (1985).

We note that a further statement of the Malek rule includes: “When a motion for postconviction relief and the files and records…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. IrishNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. TweedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. RoseNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  2. State v. SilversNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. JohnsonNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. StartNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API