United States v. One Chevrolet Truck
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The court judicially knows that an indictment has been returned against James Curry, wbo was in charge of the truck, and others, charging conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138*4 et seq.). Section 3450, R. S. (Comp. St. § 6352), has application where goods are removed, deposited, or concealed with intent to defraud the United States of the tax provided by law. The clear inference also is that this liquor was fraudulently brought into the United States. It was imported in violation of law. No tax has been paid.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- United States v. One Haynes AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
- Reed v. ThurmondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
- One Ford Touring Car v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- United States v. One Bay State RoadsterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- UMB Bank NA v. Harvest Gold Silica IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024