Legal Opinion

UMB Bank NA v. Harvest Gold Silica Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 4, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01105Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 UMB Bank NA, No. CV-22-01105-PHX-GMS 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Harvest Gold Silica Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Pending before the Court are Defendants Harvest Gold Silica, Inc. (“HGS”) and 17 Vast Mountain Development, Inc.’s (“VMD”) Motion to Stay Receivership Orders 18 Pending Appeal and Request for Expedited Consideration (Doc. 120); Defendants HGS 19 and VMD’s Emergency Motion for Temporary Stay Pending District Court Ruling on 20 Motion to Stay Receivership Orders Pending Appeal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API