Milda Dabol v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge.
Mrs. Dabol appeals from an adverse judgment in an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act. 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 1402(b), 2671-2680.
The district court found that while crossing a street in a marked crosswalk not controlled by a traffic signal, Mrs. Dabol passed in front of a vehicle stopped halfway across the crosswalk in the first lane, and, without looking to determine whether traffic was approaching, walked into the side of a slow-moving Air Force vehicle in the next lane. The court concluded that “Milda Dabol was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estill v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Kollodge v. F. AND L. APPLIANCES, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Lofland v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- James v. EllisWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Rettig v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Appearance Bond Surety v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Burnham v. NehrenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Garcia v. WillmuthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Milda Dabol v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964