Legal Opinion

Milda Dabol v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1964No. 18935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

Mrs. Dabol appeals from an adverse judgment in an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act. 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 1402(b), 2671-2680.

The district court found that while crossing a street in a marked crosswalk not controlled by a traffic signal, Mrs. Dabol passed in front of a vehicle stopped halfway across the crosswalk in the first lane, and, without looking to determine whether traffic was approaching, walked into the side of a slow-moving Air Force vehicle in the next lane. The court concluded that “Milda Dabol was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estill v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Kollodge v. F. AND L. APPLIANCES, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Lofland v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. James v. EllisWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Rettig v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Appearance Bond Surety v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Burnham v. NehrenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Garcia v. WillmuthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Milda Dabol v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API