Legal Opinion

Milda Dabol v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1964No. 18935Published

1Opinion of the Court

337 F.2d 163

Milda DABOL, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 18935.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

September 9, 1964.

Rehearing Denied En Banc

October 9, 1964.

Vernon R. Pearson, Davies, Pearson, Anderson & Pearson, Tacoma, Wash., for appellant.

Brockman Adams, U. S. Atty., Charles W. Billinghurst, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tacoma, Wash., for appellee.

Before MADDEN, Judge of the Court of Claims, and BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

1

Mrs. Dabol appeals from an adverse judgment in an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act. 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b),…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estill v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Kollodge v. F. AND L. APPLIANCES, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Lofland v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Terry v. BiswellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Allen v. HartWashington Supreme Court · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API