Legal Opinion

Semon v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1902No. 19,727PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Madison Circuit Court; J. F. McClure, Judge. Justin Semon was convicted of receiving stolen goods, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Appellant, was convicted of receiving stolen goods. He asks for a reversal of the judgment for alleged errors of the court in overruling his joint and separate motion to quash the affidavit and information and his motion for a new trial. The charging part of the affidavit is in these words: “Emile C. Fessler, who, being duly sworn, upon his oath says that Justin Semon on the-day of October, A. D. 1899, at and in the county of Madison, and State of Indiana, did then,and there unlawfully and feloniously buy, receive, conceal, and aid in the concealment of *56eight overcoats, forty-seven suit…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Betts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
  4. State v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Brooster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Russell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Wertheimer & Goldberg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Naftzger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  4. State v. AldermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  5. McCallister v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API