Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 20, 1932No. 14724PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for selling intoxicating liquor; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The jury have passed on the facts, which are in conflict, and there being sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached, we must decline to interfere. There are seven bills of exception, which will be noticed in their order.

A charge which tells the jury that the accused is indicted for the offense of selling intoxicating liquor to one Sheffer, and that in no event can appellant be convicted of any other offense than that charged in the indictment, is not open to an objection that it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Garner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Snow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Steele v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frank Smith v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Kennedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Ballard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Sloane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Vannoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API