Legal Opinion

Hammond v. District of Columbia Board of Parole

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 2000No. 99-SP-83PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Senior Judge:

Appellant Kenneth Hammond appeals the trial court’s order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to D.C.Code § 16-1901 (1999 Supp.), in which he asserted that his due process rights were violated when — following his successful challenge of the D.C. Parole Board’s initial parole revocation order — the Board imposed a longer set-off, i.e., the period of time which must pass before it would next consider releasing him on parole. He contends that the Board’s actions in imposing a longer set-off triggered a presumption of vindictiveness, and that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allston v. GainesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  2. Gambrell v. FulwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. Blackmon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Hammond v. QuickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. STEWART (TOMMY) v. NEV. BD. OF PAROLE COMM'R (CRIMINAL)Nevada Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API