Legal Opinion
Gambrell v. Fulwood
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-0626PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
Dismissing Case
I. INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss. 1 Plaintiffs are five individuals currently serving sentences in federal prison for various violations of the District of Columbia Code. Plaintiffs bring suit against the Chairman and three Commissioners of the United States Parole Commission (collectively, “the Commission”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs allege that the Commission violated their constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause, the Ex Post Facto Clause, and the First…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ford, Jr. v. MassaroneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Void v. SmootDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Gambrell v. FulwoodCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015