Legal Opinion

Long v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 6, 2005No. 04-2174PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, Kheang Hong Long, a native and citizen of Cambodia, seeks review of the denial of his application for asylum. The Immigration Judge (IJ) found that Long was not credible, and that he failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirmed and adopted the IJ’s decision. We affirm the BIA and deny the petition for review. 1

I

Long entered the United States as a visitor for pleasure on February 16, 2001. Long timely filed an application for asylum, claiming he had been a victim of past…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Albathani v. INSCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. Jarnail Singh v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. PULABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1987
  5. Rodriguez-Ramirez v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Elysee v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. El-Labaki v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. Kartasheva v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Melhem v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. Andri v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API