Legal Opinion
United States v. Miller
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 28, 1968No. Cr. 11191PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
This is an application for an injunction to restrain the defendant, James Miller, his attorneys and their investigators from interviewing any members of the petit jury which on June 2, 1966, returned a verdict of guilty on an indictment charging the defendant with violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174.
Eighteen months after the verdict, on December 2, 1967, the defendant and his counsel through private investigators employed by them undertook to interview all of the members of that jury. When this activity was brought to the attention of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Commonwealth v. FidlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- United States v. James MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. HallDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
- United States v. WintersDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.