Legal Opinion

Varano v. Protection Mutual Fire Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County

Decided November 10, 1947No. nos. 86, 87, 88Published

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

— Plaintiffs instituted three actions in assumpsit against defendants on four policies of fire insurance for damages alleged to have been sustained by them by reason of the destruction of their dwelling house and personal property contained therein, by fire. These cases were tried together before the court and a jury and resulted in verdicts for plaintiffs, totalling $2,750, with interest. The cases are now before the court on defendants’ motions for judgment n. o. v. on the whole record and for a new trial.

In their statements of claim and upon the trial of the cases, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Medvidovich v. SchultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Bockstoce Et Ux. v. Pittsbgh. Rwys. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Tannenbaum v. Connecticut Fire Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Harbridge Et Ux. v. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API