Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Markowitz

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 15, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

This proceeding arises upon three motions to strike out specified objections interposed by as many objectors, a like number of motions for bills of particulars and a motion for examination of one of the accounting executors.

The briefs submitted on behalf of the estate indulge almost wholly in dissertations respecting alleged facts which are in no wise supported by the record. In this respect they are wholly valueless for any purpose. (Matter of Mehler, 143 Misc. 63, 64; Matter of Morningstar, Id. 620, 624.)

The motions to strike out are directed to the objections of Mamie Weil and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Accounting of Parascandola v. National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. In re the Estate of EbbetsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of AuditoreNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1914
  5. Underhill v. NewburgerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of DuniganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  2. In re the Estate of FelterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  3. In re the Estate of LesserNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  4. In re the Estate of AbramowitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  5. In re the Estate of RazouxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API