Legal Opinion
Palmer v. Sprint Nextel Corp.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 7, 2009No. Case C09-1211JLRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on Defendant Sprint Nextel Corporation’s (“Sprint”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 12). Sprint requests that the court dismiss Plaintiff Sandra L. Palmer’s state law claims on the basis that they are preempted by federal law. The parties have not requested oral argument. Having considered the motion, as well as all papers filed in support and opposition, and for the following reasons, the court DENIES the motion (Dkt. # 12).
II.BACKGROUND
Ms. Palmer asserts claims against Sprint under the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hickey v. Voxernet LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- Patriotic Veterans, Inc. v. Indiana Ex Rel. ZoellerDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2011