Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided April 8, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Lindsley Smith State Representative

340 North Rollston Avenue Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701-4178

Dear Representative Smith:

You have asked for my opinion on whether A.C.A. § 5-63-204(a)(1) (Repl. 2005), which prohibits certain so-called "robo-calls," is preempted by or otherwise conflicts with "federal law."

RESPONSE

For the reasons explained below, while it is difficult to say definitively, in my opinion the portion of subsection 5-63-204(a)(1) that prohibits robo-calls "in connection with a political campaign" is highly suspect when considered in relation to the First Amendment to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API