Konecky v. Camco Wireline, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The issue before us is whether Kevin Ko-necky is eligible for vocational reemployment benefits under AS 23.30.041(e). The Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) ruled that he was not, and the superior court affirmed. We affirm the decision of the superi- or court.
Alaska Statute 23.30.041(e) provides for reemployment benefits when the injured employee’s physical capacities are less than the physical demands of the employee’s job as described in the United States Department of Labor’s Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Although Konecky’s job and like…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Earth Resources Co. of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Rydwell v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Hood v. State, Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Barrington v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Vandenberg v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Halliburton Energy Services v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.