Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pearson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1974No. Appeal, 1808PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This appeal is from a denial of a petition for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

On M!ay 7, 1965, the appellant Oscar Pearson was convicted on eleven bills of indictment each charging him with aggravated robbery. Although sentence was suspended on three of the bills, appellant received consecutive sentences of five to ten years on the remaining eight bills. Appellant appealed to this Court and we affirmed the judgments of sentence. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania granted allocatur and subsequently reversed the judgments and ordered a new trial.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. PearsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Commonwealth v. PearsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SheltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. CutilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. McReynolds, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API