Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cutillo

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1975No. Appeal, 242PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, contends that the lower court erred in granting the appel-lee’s petition to dismiss charges pending against him. The appellee was not brought to trial within 270 days after the filing of the complaint, as required by Rule 1100, Pa. R. Crim. P.

On November 8, 1973, a criminal complaint was filed charging the appellee with blackmail and cheating by fraudulent pretenses. On November 26, 1973, the grand jury returned a bill of indictment on these two counts. 1 Under Rule 1100(a):(l)i, as adopted June 8, 1973, “[tjrial in a court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. PearsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MancusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. MetzgerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. MillhouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. SilverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API