Commonwealth v. Cutillo
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Appellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, contends that the lower court erred in granting the appel-lee’s petition to dismiss charges pending against him. The appellee was not brought to trial within 270 days after the filing of the complaint, as required by Rule 1100, Pa. R. Crim. P.
On November 8, 1973, a criminal complaint was filed charging the appellee with blackmail and cheating by fraudulent pretenses. On November 26, 1973, the grand jury returned a bill of indictment on these two counts. 1 Under Rule 1100(a):(l)i, as adopted June 8, 1973, “[tjrial in a court…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. PearsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MancusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MetzgerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MillhouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. SilverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.