Legal Opinion · Dissent

Loomis, Inc. v. Cudahy

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1982No. 13291Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

Mr. Nord, who appeared with Mr. Lawson and argued on behalf of Mrs. Cudahy on appeal, grouped his argument into three parts. First, he argued that Mrs. Cudahy should not have been forced into arbitration on the basis of the form agreement which Smith produced and she obligingly signed. Second, he argued that the arbitration hearing officer and the tribunal which appointed him were not justified in proceeding in the face of a motion for postponement— hence the district court erred in not vacating the award and allowing her a day in court. Third, he argued that because of the myriad of issues…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API