Legal Opinion

Horning v. McGill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1917No. 23,269PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court; Walter A. Funk, Judge. Action by Emanuel M. Horning against William McGill. From a judgment for the defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtErwin, C. J.

— This action was in replevin, brought by appellant against appellee before a justice of the peace. Appeal was taken to the circuit court. The complaint in one paragraph alleges unlawful detention of personal property, which complaint was answered in three paragraphs. Demurrer to second and third paragraphs of answer was sustained. Appellee then filed his amended second paragraph of answer. Upon the issues so joined trial was had. At the end of plaintiff’s (appellant’s) evidence appellee made a motion for a peremptory instruction to direct a verdict for defendant (appellee), which was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sandage v. Studabaker Bros. Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Beecher v. Peru Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Paragon Oil Syndicate v. Rhoades Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Uhlmann v. Kin DawOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Humphrey v. City National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Huey v. PassarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Peter & Burghard Stone Co. v. CarperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API