Hodgson v. Lakewood Broadcasting Service, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WINNER, District Judge.
The case is before the Court on stipulated facts, and the parties have agreed that the Court shall “decide this litigation on the basis of the facts enumerated in this stipulation without other testimony or documentary exhibits.” Accordingly, the Court incorporates by reference and finds all of the stipulated facts.
In summary terms, the stipulation recites that defendant is engaged in the radio broadcasting business, and that substantial interstate commerce is involved. One James Martin was employed as an announcer from January 16, 1970, through May…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Finance Acceptance Company v. BreauxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- Tiger v. SellersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Salazar v. HardinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martin v. PepsiAmericas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Commerce Union Bank v. Haffner (In Re Haffner)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1981
- In Re WardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997