Legal Opinion
Salazar v. Hardin
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided July 15, 1970No. Civ. A. No. C-1617PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have instituted this suit as a class action on behalf of all farm workers employed in the production of sugar beets who work or will work for crew leadérs. They seek a declaratory judgment that 7 C.F.R. § 862.15 is invalid because inconsistent with 7 U.S.C. § 1131(c) (1). Also demanded is a permanent injunction against the Secretary *1258of Agriculture prohibiting his making sugar payments to any person who pays crew leaders rather than sugar beet workers directly. We have previously determined that this Court has…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Marguerite B. KilbornCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Judith Ann Petersen v. Talisman Sugar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Hodgson v. Lakewood Broadcasting Service, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1971
- Judith Ann Petersen v. Talisman Sugar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Rodriguez v. ZimbelmanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1970