Legal Opinion
Avera v. Clark Moulding
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided March 23, 1990No. 05-89-00396-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McCLUNG, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Ronald and Rose Avera (the Aver-as) of Houston and Clark Moulding Company, Incorporated (Clark) of Dallas are in the business of manufacturing and selling picture frame moulding. The Averas had a process to produce a marble faux appearance as a finish on picture frame moulding. Being desirous of expanding production of such a product, the Averas began a series of discussions with Clark about a business arrangement between them. In essence, Clark’s larger capacity for manufacturing, marketing, and capital coupled with the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Gaines v. HammanTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Smith v. BolinTexas Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- IAC, LTD. v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- W.C. Phillips and Mary Phillips, D/B/A Ambusher, Inc. v. Claude Frey, Jr., Claude Frey, Jr., Gary Arnold, and Buck-Pro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Geochem Tech Corp. v. Verseckes, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1996
- Wellogix, Inc. v. Accenture, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.