Legal Opinion
Oja v. Dayton Hudson Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 24, 1990No. C0-90-193PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Linda Oja appeals from a grant of summary judgment to respondent Dayton Hudson Corporation (Dayton's). We affirm.
FACTS
Oja has a 24-year employment history with Dayton’s. She currently works part-time as a sales consultant in one of Dayton’s shoe departments.
Dayton’s procedures require a sales consultant to enter her employee number into the computer terminal while completing a sale. A sales consultant is also required to write her employee number on the box of shoes sold.
Dayton’s has a liberal policy on returns, and will generally take back any shoes which do not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Niccum v. Hydra Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Stiff v. Associated Sewing Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Meyer v. Mason Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hudgins v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Glass v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Mytych v. May Department Stores Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Erdman v. Jovoco, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994