Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 13, 1989No. 05-86-00645-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND PROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

BAKER, Justice.

The issue presented on this remand from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, 761 S.W.2d 22, is whether the submission of the unconstitutional parole and good time instructions mandated by article 37.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure contributed to the jury’s assessment of appellant’s punishment. We find beyond a reasonable doubt that the submission of these instructions did not contribute to the appellant’s punishment and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

This is the third time that we have had occasion to consider…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Haynie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  5. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hupp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API