Legal Opinion

Siegal v. Haver

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 7, 1966No. 1 CA-CIV 272PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Judge.

This is a suit by the plaintiff below,- an architectural partnership, to recover fees and expenses earned by reason of a contract for architectural services between the plaintiff and the defendants. The matter was tried before the court without a jury, and from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $31,000.00, the defendants appeal.

We are called upon to interpret the contract and the addendum thereto, and to determine whether or not the facts support a judgment against defendants Allen E. Siegal and his wife Beatrice, and Marc A. Siegal, son of the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tyson v. TysonArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Donato v. FishburnArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Moeur v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Parrish v. TahtarasUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Woodward v. WhiteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beaugureau v. BeaugureauCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. Keplinger v. BoyettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Love v. Double" AA" Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Kreiss v. ShippCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Kleeb v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API