Legal Opinion

State v. Bryden R. Williams (070388)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 6, 2014No. A-5-12PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Paragraph 10 of the New Jersey Constitution confer on a defendant the right to confront the witnesses against him. That right gives a defendant the opportunity to bar testimony in violation of the Confrontation Clause and the opportunity to cross-examine a witness. A defendant, however, is not obliged to exercise his confrontation right if doing so will harm his cause. As part of a reasonable defense strategy, he may waive his right of confrontation and choose not to object to testimony or choose not to cross-examine a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. David Bass(072669)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  2. William James v. Rosalind RuizNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
  3. State v. Deshawn P. Wilson(076609)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  4. State v. Khalid Mohammed(075901)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  5. State of New Jersey v. James J. MautiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API