Legal Opinion

Gregory O’Neal v. Tanimura & Antle Fresh Foods, Inc.; City of Yuma

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 17, 2025No. 2:25-cv-01413Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 No. CV-25-01413-PHX-DGC 11 Gregory O’Neal, ORDER 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 Tanimura & Antle Fresh Foods, Inc.; and City of Yuma, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Gregory O’Neal asserts claims against Defendants Tanimura & Antle Fresh 19 Foods, Inc. (“Tanimura”) and the City of Yuma (the “City”), which stem from the City’s 20 approval of Tanimura’s housing project. Tanimura has filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff 21 has filed motions for entry of default and default judgment, motions to amend, motions to 22…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API