Gregory O’Neal v. Tanimura & Antle Fresh Foods, Inc.; City of Yuma
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 No. CV-25-01413-PHX-DGC 11 Gregory O’Neal, ORDER 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 Tanimura & Antle Fresh Foods, Inc.; and City of Yuma, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Gregory O’Neal asserts claims against Defendants Tanimura & Antle Fresh 19 Foods, Inc. (“Tanimura”) and the City of Yuma (the “City”), which stem from the City’s 20 approval of Tanimura’s housing project. Tanimura has filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff 21 has filed motions for entry of default and default judgment, motions to amend, motions to 22…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.