Legal Opinion

Ledoux v. Bank of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Albert R. Ledoux, from portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 13th day of March, 1897, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

This action was brought against the East River Silk Company to foreclose a chattel mortgage made by it to the plaintiff, and also against certain receivers of the mortgagor and against the Bank of America and the National Union Bank, who procured attachments under which levies were made upon the property of the silk company. The Bank of America subsequently recovered a judgment against the silk company on its claim. Other parties, not necessary to mention, are also made defendants. -In addition to the foreclosure of the mortgage, the object of the action was to cut off the liens…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trenton Banking Company v. . DuncanNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Candee v. . LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  3. Strong v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Decker v. . DeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. McAlpine v. SweetserIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stone v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Alkire Grocery Co. v. RichesinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1899
  3. Nicholas v. . LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Nicholas v. LordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Seymour v. BergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API