Legal Opinion

Ecological Systems v. the City of Dayton, Unpublished Decision (2-1-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 2002No. C.A. Case No. 18950, 18951, 18966, T.C. Case No. 00-1214Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Ecological Systems, Inc. is appealing the judgment of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, finding that Ecological Systems, Inc.'s wastewater is hauled waste and that the Dayton municipal ordinance prohibiting waste from outside the city does not violate the Ohio Constitution. The City of Dayton is cross-appealing the judgment finding that the Dayton municipal ordinance violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

The City of Dayton maintains a publicly owned treatment works (hereinafter "POTW") for the processing of solid and liquid wastes within the Dayton service…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. New Energy Co. of Indiana v. LimbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API