Legal Opinion

Security National Bank v. Sternberger

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.

Tbe main question involved: Is tbe written instrument in controversy, admitted to be executed by all of tbe members of tbe family in reference to tbe 8,790 shares of stock in tbe Revolution Cotton Mills, such a contract as to entitle tbe trustee to bold tbe certificates of stock against tbe demands of plaintiffs? We think not.

Tbe written instrument is a simple, passive or dry .trust, not an active or special trust. Tbe distinction between simple, passive or dry trusts and special or active trusts is pointed out succinctly in Perry on Trusts and Trustees (7th Ed.), Vol. 1, sec. 18, p. 14,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Hicks.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Lee v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Springs v. HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Troy & North Carolina Gold Mining Co. v. Snow Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Bridges v. . PleasantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1845

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Finch v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Lee v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Akin v. First National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Springs v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API