Legal Opinion
Farkas v. Farkas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 1, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered June 23, 2005, awarding plaintiff $750,000 with interest from August 6, 2003, reversed, on the law, without costs, the judgment vacated and the claim underlying the judgment dismissed as abandoned pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.48 (b).
The Court of Appeals has recently made it clear that “statutory time frames—like court-ordered time frames—are not options, they are requirements, to be taken seriously by the parties” (Miceli v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 3 NY3d 725, 726 [2004] [citation omitted],…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Tewari v. TsoutsourasNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Gonzalez v. 98 Mag Leasing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Andrea v. Arnone, Hedin, Casker, Kennedy & Drake, Architects & Landscape Architects, P.C.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Farkas v. FarkasNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Rahman v. DomberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007