Legal Opinion

DENVER URBAN RENEW. AUTH. v. Berglund-Cherne Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1976No. 75-317PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

553 P.2d 99 (1976)

DENVER URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY, a body corporate and politic of the State of Colorado, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

BERGLUND-CHERNE COMPANY, a Colorado Corporation and Elmer A. Johnson, Treasurer of the City and County of Denver, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 75-317.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

February 19, 1976.

Rehearing Denied March 25, 1976.

Certiorari Granted May 24, 1976.

John H. Williamson Denver, for petitioner-appellant.

Dawson, Nagel, Sherman & Howard, Raymond J. Turner, Frederick Y. Yu, Denver, for respondent-appellee Berglund-Cherne Co.

Selected for Official Publication.

COY…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  2. City & County of Denver v. QuickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  3. Department of Highways v. SchulhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sandoval v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Berglund-Cherne Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. Lapp v. City of WorlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Vista Resorts, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Meier v. McCoyColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API