Legal Opinion

Castillo v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided August 26, 2010No. Case 08-21850-CIVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DE 132]

ALAN S. GOLD, District Judge.

I. Introduction

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Teledyne Continental Motors Inc.’s (“Teledyne” or “Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to the General Aviation and Revitalization Act [DE 132]. I have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2). 1 Having carefully considered the relevant submissions, the applicable law, and being otherwise duly advised, I deny Defendant’s motion for the reasons that follow.

II. Background

On June 30, 2006, an aircraft took off from La Aurora International…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Stewart v. Happy Herman's Cheshire Bridge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. DePuy Orthopedics, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
  2. Crouch v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2011
  3. Lona Leann Grosshart v. Kansas City Power & Light CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API