Legal Opinion

Etheredge v. Tennessee Valley Bank

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1925No. 8 Div. 289PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The first and second assignments of error, which go to the rulings-of the court upon the admission of testimony, are not supported by authority cited, and the argument of appellant’s counsel to sustain these assignments is:

“The first two assignments are based on rulings of the court on the admission of evidence in the case, and we respectfully insist that the court committed error against this appellant by holding against Mm in these rulings.”

This statement, of course, is of no aid to-the court in arriving at a decision of this case. The brief does not comply with the rule, and these two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Syllacauga Land Co. v. HendrixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. BallardAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. American Trust Co. of Nashville, Tenn. v. HannaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. WolffCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  2. Gorum v. MottAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Farmers Co-op. Warehouse Ass'n v. ShiklesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Bowman v. StreetAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Jordan v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API