Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1950No. 7 Div. 102Published

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

The plaintiff below brought suit in common count for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant.

The trial was by the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

The appellant claimed that he did not receive the goods. On this question a disputed factual issue is presented by the evidence.

Counsel in brief fails to sufficiently argue several of the assignments of error. We will not respond to these. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Quinton, 194 Ala. 126, 69 So. 604; Howell v. Moon, 217 Ala. 421, 116 So. 518; Etheredge v. Tenn. Valley…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. QuintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Powell v. BinghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Humphries v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  4. Howell v. MoonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Etheredge v. Tennessee Valley BankAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API