Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

LOVERIDGE v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 26, 2024No. 16-912Published

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-912 Filed: November 26, 2024 PERRY LOVERIDGE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Thomas S. Stewart and Reed W. Ripley, Stewart, Wald & Smith, LLC, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiffs. Kimberly A. Cullen and LeeAnn Kim, Trial Attorneys, David A. Harrington, Assistant Chief, Todd Kim, Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Defendant. POST-TRIAL OPINION AND ORDER TAPP, Judge. 1 When a plaintiff’s burden of proof is undermined by…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API