Legal Opinion

Shuler v. Whitmore

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The action is to recover for personal injuries and damages to plaintiff’s automobile, resulting from a collision between said automobile and a truck owned by defendant and operated by its agent. It is alleged in the complaint that the accident occurred at a time when plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile owned by her and operated by one Katherine Tack. The answer admits that a collision occurred between defendant’s truck and an automobile in which plaintiff was riding, and denies negligence on its part.

This motion is made by defendant under subdivision 2 of section 193 and section 211-a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Sherlock v. ManwarenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Haines v. Bero Engineering Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Greenhouse v. Rochester Taxicab Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  5. Secured Finance Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Milgate v. WraithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Parks v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Darrohn v. RussellCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
  4. Shuler v. Whitmore, Rauber & VicinusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API