Legal Opinion

BNSF Ry. Co. v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 13, 2018No. 16-17130PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

The California State Board of Equalization ("California") appeals from a preliminary injunction preventing implementation of California Senate Bill 84 ("SB 84"). Cal. Gov't Code §§ 8574.30 - 8574.48. SB 84 requires railroads to collect fees from customers shipping certain hazardous materials and then to remit those fees to California. Id. § 8574.32(a), (b). BNSF Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company ("the Railroads") sued to enjoin SB 84, arguing that it violates three federal statutes and the federal Constitution. The district court found that the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty. v. Bnsf Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Assoc. of American Railroads v. RandolphDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. Association of American Railroads v. JacobsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
  4. BNSF Railway Company v. Clark CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  5. Edward Gallegos, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Mary Diana Moe, Deceased v. BNSF Railway Co., a Delaware corporationDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2026

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API