Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Meyers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1943No. Appeal, 106PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Reno, J.,

The sole question is whether the Commonwealth’s wholly circumstantial evidence sustains appellant’s conviction of receiving stolen goods.

The uncontradicted evidence is that on January 24, 1943, the premises of Joseph M. Beatty in Pittsburgh were burglarized and 4000 spark plugs stolen. They were “Auto Lite” plugs and known as types T-9, T-7, B-7, TH-8, TIT-4, and F-ll. The TH-4s were a new type, specially developed for heavy duty automobile trucks, were still in “the experimental stage”, and comparatively few had been sold. The F-lls were originally designed for the old…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. MarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. AnthonyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Commonwealth v. HoltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Commonwealth v. KauffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Commonwealth v. PreziosoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Commonwealth v. CohanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API