Legal Opinion

White v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 10, 1968No. 53250PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKARD, Commissioner.

While represented by employed counsel of his own selection, defendant was found guilty by a jury of the possession of narcotic drugs in violation of Section 195.020 RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S., and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of eight years. No motion for new trial was filed, but an appeal was taken and the judgment was affirmed. State v. White, Mo., 408 S.W.2d 31. Defendant has filed a motion under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., to vacate the judgment and sentence. A full evidentiary hearing was held on the motion in the trial court, findings of fact and conclusions of law…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Crosswhite v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Coney v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  2. State v. McClainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. McQueenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. Rodgers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Schneider v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API