Legal Opinion

People v. Dillwood

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1895No. 21,121PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Fresno County; S. A. Holmes, Judge. Alfred M. Dillwood was convicted of burglary, and appeals.

1Per curiam

The appellant was convicted of burglary in the first degree, and appeals from the judgment and an order denying a new trial.

Thomas Philbin, a witness for the prosecution, admitted upon cross-examination that he had been convicted of a felony prior to June 21, 1893, and afterward, and prior to the trial of this case, was granted a new trial. On June 21st he was a witness in behalf of Dillwood upon his examination before the justice upon the same charge of burglary here in question, and in his examination in chief in the superior court had testified to facts which, if believed by the jury,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ChuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. Ching Hing ChangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. HectorOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. People v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API