People v. Ching Hing Chang
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Information accusing defendants of robbery. The newly discovered evidence is of a character that might have been discovered by reasonable diligence in time to have produced it at the triaL It need *391not therefore be further considered. In the progress of the trial several exceptions were reserved to the rulings of the court, which it will be necessary to pass on.
1. Chin Len, the complainant, was called as a witness, and testified that he had collected the money, of which he testified he was robbed, from a relative of his named Kee, on Pacific Street, where Kee kept a wash-house; and that at the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gaffney v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Morrison v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. SteevesOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. ChuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. OroscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Keane v. Pittsburg Lead Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.