Cox v. Martin Marietta Energy Systems
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
Two issues have been raised on this appeal, one factual and one legal. The factu al issue arises from employee Roy Cox, Jr.’s, Plaintiff-Appellant, averment that the percent of permanent disability awarded by the trial court is too low. The Tennessee Department of Labor, Second Injury Fund (the Fund), Defendant-Appellant, avers that the trial court erred in the apportionment of disability benefits between the employer and the Fund. This legal issue requires an interpretation of T.C.A. § 50-6-208(b) to ascertain whether the statutory language “workers’ compensation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lock v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Burris v. Cross Mountain Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Hale v. CNA InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Minton v. State Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Jaske v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Federated Insurance Co. v. LethcoeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Bomely v. Mid-America Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Graves v. Cocke CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Huddleston v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Bomely v. Mid-America Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.